Compatibility of Computer-based Learning with Differentiated Learning Styles of Chemical Engineering Students as Evidenced by the Outcomes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61569/j8pvh482Keywords:
Competency-based learning, Four-step e-learning, Teaching strategy, Transition mortality/survival rateAbstract
The incorporation of more computer-based courses and teaching-learning strategies in the Chemical Engineering (CHE) curriculum prompted educators to use information technology more effectively and efficiently. Thus, this research investigated the compatibility of Computer-Based Learning (CBL) with the learning styles of the CHE students through their learning outcomes. With a quasi-experimental research design, the researcher employed a CBL instrument structured in four steps (see-try-do-explain) and assessed the learning style preferences using the Felder-Solomon Index of learning style. The respondents included all fourth-year students enrolled in the Computer Applications in Chemical Engineering. The study revealed that CHE students are mostly sensing and visual; they found it hardest to transition from step ‘see’ to step ‘try’. Verbal and global learners will most likely survive in the four-step CBL while active learners will lag. However, the research failed to show that CBL was significantly compatible with the differentiated learning styles of the CHE students.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the license is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: Creative Commons Attributions 4.0 International License.