Tracer Study of the Graduate Teacher Education Programs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61569/qjatek77Keywords:
Curricular revision, Graduate teacher education, Policy redirection, Professional and personal competence, Tracer studyAbstract
This research aimed to comprehensively understand postgraduate programs’ knowledge, skills, contribution, and relevance. It also sought valuable insights for program enhancement. Employing a descriptive study approach, both qualitative and quantitative data were investigated. Quantitative data was analyzed through arithmetic means, while thematic analysis was employed for qualitative data assessment. Thirty-one Master of Arts in Education (M.A.Ed.) and Doctor of Education (Ed.D.) participants meeting specific criteria were selected using purposive sampling. Data collection followed a systematic process with ethical considerations at the forefront. Findings revealed that participants highly rated satisfaction, program contribution, and relevance to their teaching education. Recommendations included enhancing school site accessibility, offering flexible learning methods, improving document processing efficiency, involving students in research, expanding graduate courses, bolstering internet connectivity, and strengthening student-teacher relationships. The graduate curriculum significantly contributed to personal and professional growth, enabling competency in current roles. Consequently, the study suggests adapting graduate programs based on benchmarked best practices from state universities to fortify the graduate education program.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Educational and Human Resource Development (JEHRD)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the license is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: Creative Commons Attributions 4.0 International License.